RESEARCH PAPER
Tobacco perceptions and practices: User groups and demographic characteristics, Mississippi, USA
Thomas J. Payne 1, 2  
,   Joy L. Hart 2, 3  
,   Aida L. Giachello 2, 4  
,   Kandi L. Walker 2, 3  
,   Wei Wang 5,   Allison Groom 2, 6  
,   Mario Sims 2, 7,   Clara G. Sears 2, 3,   Alexander S. Lee 2, 3,   Lindsay K. Tompkins 2, 3,   Anshula Kesh 2, 8  
,   Karen Robb 2, 6,   Rose M. Robertson 2, 9
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, United States
2
American Heart Association Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, Dallas, United States
3
Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
4
Department of Preventative Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
5
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, United States
6
Customer and Marketing Research, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States
7
Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, United States
8
Office of Science Operations, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States
9
Science and Medicine Office, American Heart Association, Dallas, United States
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Joy L. Hart   

Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Submission date: 2020-05-27
Final revision date: 2020-08-22
Acceptance date: 2020-09-03
Publication date: 2020-09-30
 
Popul. Med. 2020;2(September):30
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Despite decreases in the overall US smoking rate, tobacco use remains more common in some areas and by some groups. Deeper understanding of group differences is needed in order to tailor public health campaigns to the interests, perceptions and experiences of targeted audiences. Although some differences have been identified across African American and Caucasian smokers in the United States, additional insight is needed regarding factors that differentiate these groups. This study examined tobacco related perceptions and practices, with an emphasis on identifying differences across African American and Caucasian smokers. Toward this goal, we examined key demographic variables of race and age, and tobacco use characteristics.

Methods:
The sample consisted of 284 people from the Jackson, Mississippi area who participated in focus groups and completed surveys addressing a variety of tobacco related topics, including knowledge and perceptions of products as well as use and health information seeking behavior. The selection criteria and recruitment approach ensured a balance across race (black, white), age (18–34, >35 years), sex, and cigarette smoking status (current, former, never). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (v.9.4).

Results:
Differences were observed across demographic subgroups regarding type and pattern of tobacco products used (e.g. mentholated, markers of nicotine dependence, hookah). Differences in preferred sources of health information based on age as well as perceptions of risk as a function of age, smoking status and race were also noted. Exposure to secondhand smoke and perceptions of its risks, quitting efforts and cessation methods differed by race.

Conclusions:
Study findings suggest key differences across important subgroups. Knowledge of such differences has the potential to improve strategic public health messaging, allowing health campaigns to more effectively prevent tobacco product uptake as well as promote interest in quitting tobacco.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We extend special thanks to Elandra Felix who conducted participant recruitment and various study activities, and Debbra Hunter who assisted with administrative aspects of study implementation.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have each completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. All authors report grants from National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and FDA Center for Tobacco Products under Award Numbers P50HL120163 and U54HL120163. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, the Food and Drug Administration, or the American Heart Association. The funding sponsors had no role in study design; data collection, analyses, or interpretation; manuscript preparation; or the decision to publish the results.
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Smoking and health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. In: Public Health Service Publications, No. 1103. https://www.govinfo.gov/conten.... Published 1964. Accessed August 22, 2020.
 
2.
Creamer MR, Wang TW, Babb S, et al. Tobacco product use and cessation indicators among adults-United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(45):1013-1019. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a2
 
3.
Rostron BL, Schroeder MJ, Ambrose BK. Dependence symptoms and cessation intentions among US adult daily cigarette, cigar, and e-cigarette users, 2012-2013. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):814. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3510-2
 
4.
Wang TW, Gentzke AS, Creamer MR, et al. Tobacco product use and associated factors among middle and high school students-United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019;68(12):1‐22. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6812a1
 
5.
Wang TW, Asman K, Gentzke AS, et al. Tobacco product use among adults-United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(44):1225‐1232. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6744a2
 
6.
World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011: Warning about the dangers of tobacco. https://apps.who.int/iris/bits.... Published 2011. Accessed August 22, 2020.
 
7.
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Involvement and persuasion: Tradition vs. integration. Psych Bull. 1990;107(3):367-374. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.367
 
8.
Giovino G, Villanti AC, Mowery PD, Sevilimendu V, Niaura R, Vallone DM, Abrams DB. Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: Is menthol slowing progress?. Tob Control. 2015;24(1):28-37. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051159
 
9.
Payne TJ, Diefenbach L. Characteristics of African-American smokers: A brief review. Am J Med Sci. 2003;326(4):212-215. doi:10.1097/00000441-200310000-00012
 
10.
Smith PH, Assefa B, Kainth S, Salas-Ramirez KY, McKee SA, Giovino GA. Use of mentholated cigarettes and likelihood of smoking cessation in the United States: A meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(3):307‐316. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz067
 
11.
Benowitz NL, Dains KM, Dempsey D, Wilson M, Jacob P. Racial difference in the relationship between number of cigarettes smoked and nicotine and carcinogen exposure. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(9):772-783. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr072
 
12.
Perez-Stable EJ, Herrera B, Jacob P, Benewitz NL. Nicotine metabolism and intake in black and white smokers. JAMA, 1998;280(2):152-156. doi:10.1001/jama.280.2.152
 
13.
Weinberger AH, Platt JM, Smith PH, Goodwin RD. Racial/ethnic differences in self-reported withdrawal symptoms and quitting smoking 3 years later: A prospective, longitudinal examination of US adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19(3):373-378. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw221
 
14.
Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH). https://pathstudyinfo.nih.gov/.... Published 2018. Accessed August 22, 2020.
 
15.
PhenX Consensus Measures for Phenotypes and Exposures. Phenx Home. https://www.phenx.org/. Accessed August 22, 2020.
 
16.
Vu TT, Groom A, Hart JL, et al. Socioeconomic and demographic status and perceived health risks of e-cigarette product contents among youth: Results from a national survey. Health Promot Pract. 2020;21(1_suppl):148S‐156S. doi:10.1177/1524839919882700
 
17.
Choi K, Foster JL. Beliefs and experimentation with electronic cigarettes: A prospective analysis among young adults. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):175-178. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.007
 
18.
McMillen RC, Gottlieb MA, Shaefer RM, Winickoff JP, Klein JD. Trends in electronic cigarette use among US adults: Use is increasing in both smokers and non-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1195-1202. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu213
 
19.
Prochaska JJ, Grana RA. E-cigarette use among smokers with serious mental illness. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113013
 
20.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. E-cigarette use among youth and young adults: A report of the Surgeon General-executive summary. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2016. https://e-cigarettes.surgeonge.... Accessed August 22, 2020.
 
21.
World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENDS/ENNDS): Report by WHO. https://www.who.int/fctc/cop/c.... Published August 2016. Accessed August 22, 2020.
 
22.
Anthenelli RM, Benowitz NL, Wet R, et al. Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10037):2507-2520. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0
 
ISSN:2654-1459