BACKGROUND:
In this session we will share insights from our realist review on how participatory research (PR) works, for whom and in which contexts, by drawing on insights from the fields of infectious diseases, mental health and the health consequences of climate change. Our review seeks to distil clear causal understandings of the dynamics of PR, also considering how participatory action research (PAR) brings a distinct focus on cycles of action and reflection. Findings include recognition of the need to address power differences across all stages of research, and centre learning and reflection on action by those most affected. Our review distils insights from published academic literature as one construction of knowledge but given the practice / activist nature of the field, we want to invite critical dialogue on the limitations of an academic review to extend and challenge our findings.

METHODS:
A world cafe style workshop will introduce key findings of the review. We will start with brief provocations from scholar-practitioners. Groups discussions will consider for PR/ PAR: (1) How can expertise that lies outside of academic databases be synthesised to guide future work? (2) How does funding shape what is being done? (3) How can PAR / PR respond to the current political moment in global health?

RESULTS:
Review findings call for deliberate attention to power relations and epistemic justice in research processes. Building relationships, capacities and collaborations are also key for an effective PR process. The dialogue will help us refine practical recommendations from the review.

CONCLUSIONS:
This session will contribute to a roadmap for future work that aims to synthesise learnings from PR as a field, recognising it extends beyond the boundaries of academia. We will develop recommendations for funders and practitioners to create an enabling context for PR and PAR to realise its full potential