Bridging the Equity Divide: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Trauma Care for Aboriginal People
,
 
,
 
Daniel Y Ellis 3,1,4,5
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
Brett Shannon 13,1,12
,
 
Kate Hunter 10,11,1
,
 
,
 
Courtney Ryder 1,10,11
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
FHMRI, Collage of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
 
2
Engage, Motivate, Unite Consultancy, Ceduna, Australia
 
3
Trauma Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
 
4
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
 
5
School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
 
6
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
 
7
National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
 
8
Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
 
9
Trauma Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
 
10
The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia
 
11
School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
 
12
School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
 
13
School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, United States
 
 
Popul. Med. 2026;8(Supplement Supplement 1):
 
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT:
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for understanding health-related quality of life, mental health, and functional recovery following injury. Yet, these tools are rarely adapted to capture the lived experiences, cultural values, and social determinants of health for priority populations, particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, who bear a disproportionate burden of injury in Australia. This systematic review examined the use of PROMs in observational trauma studies involving Australian adults (≥18 years), with a focus on equity and Indigenous engagement. Searches of Medline (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Scopus identified prospective cohort and longitudinal studies on trauma-related injuries. Data were appraised using CREATE and PROGRESS-PLUS frameworks to assess cultural inclusion and equity-sensitive reporting. Across 11 studies, 17 PROMs were identified, most commonly SF-36 and PCL-C. Findings revealed persistent physical and mental health impairments post-injury, yet equity considerations were minimal. None of the studies met all PROGRESS-PLUS criteria, and Indigenous knowledges were absent. Priority populations, including Indigenous peoples, culturally and linguistically diverse communities, women, and people with disabilities, were frequently underrepresented or excluded. These gaps underscore the urgent need for culturally safe, inclusive PROMs that reflect diverse recovery experiences. Embedding equity in outcome measurement is critical to advancing trauma care, informing policy, and achieving health justice for all populations.
eISSN:2654-1459
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top