Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study
More details
Hide details
1
Division of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
2
The Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
3
Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
4
Department of Family, Community and Emergency Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Popul. Med. 2026;8(Supplement Supplement 1):A1803
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Low-to-middle income countries (LMICs) face a disproportionate burden of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. High proportions of patients in LMICs are diagnosed with advanced-stage cancer due to delayed presentation, poor referral pathways and limited diagnostic capacity. This study explores healthcare workers' (HCW) experiences, barriers and facilitators in managing patients with symptoms of possible breast, cervical or colorectal cancer.
METHODS:
A qualitative in-depth interview study with HCWs managing patients with breast, cervical and colorectal cancer symptoms. We also conducted workshops with a group of HCWs to check the credibility of the interview findings. The study was conducted with staff working in primary, secondary and tertiary public health facilities in the Eastern and Western Cape in South Africa (SA) and Harare and Bulawayo and their referral provinces in Zimbabwe. HCWs with experience in managing patients with symptoms of possible breast, cervical or colorectal cancer were recruited for the study. Participants were purposively sampled according to region, healthcare level, and job role. A total of 56 participants (26 in SA and 30 in Zimbabwe) participated in the in-depth interviews. Twenty-six (12 in SA and 14 in Zimbabwe) participated in four clinical advisory group workshops across both countries.
RESULTS:
Drawing on the Model of Pathways to Treatment, HCW perceptions of patient-level factors influencing the diagnostic interval included financial limitations, and patients’ absence and delays in attendance. Healthcare provider and system factors included: challenges with referral and feedback systems; training needs; low awareness of protocols and guidelines; inappropriate and suboptimal clinical assessments; and broader socio-economic factors and resource limitations.
CONCLUSIONS:
Improving the timely diagnosis of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in Southern Africa necessitates targeted strategies that address both patient-related, provider and health-system delays.