Commercial practices of the arms industry and implications for global public health: A scoping review
1
School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
2
School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
Popul. Med. 2026;8(Supplement Supplement 1):A3437
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
The arms industry and the global trade in weapons pose significant direct and indirect impacts to population health and equity. While health-harming industries such as tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed foods have been extensively examined with a commercial determinants of health lens, the commercial strategies of the arms industry remain critically under explored in public health research.
METHODS:
To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature published between 2004 and 2024. Searches were undertaken across four academic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, ABI/INFORM, and Business Source Complete) and Google Scholar. Data were extracted and analysed, guided by a previously published typology of commercial practices: financial, political, scientific, marketing, supply chain and waste, labour and employment, and reputational management practices.
RESULTS:
Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Marketing, political, and supply chain and waste practices were the most frequently reported, while financial, labour and employment, reputational management, and scientific practices were less common. Our review found that the arms industry not only engages in commercial practices identified within established commercial determinants of health frameworks but also employs additional strategies, such as bribery and corruption, worker surveillance, contesting worker illness claims, and a number of supply chain practices that extend beyond existing typologies. Most studies focused on firearms in the context of the USA, with limited evidence on the practices of other arms industry sub-sectors such as major conventional weapons and nuclear weapons, and little attention to low- and middle-income country contexts.
CONCLUSIONS:
Despite the scale and influence of the arms industry, its commercial sector practices remain largely overlooked in public health research. Greater scrutiny and recognition of the arms industry as a commercial determinant of health is essential to mitigate the health harms and inequities associated with the global production, proliferation, and use of weapons.
The arms industry and the global trade in weapons pose significant direct and indirect impacts to population health and equity. While health-harming industries such as tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed foods have been extensively examined with a commercial determinants of health lens, the commercial strategies of the arms industry remain critically under explored in public health research.
METHODS:
To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature published between 2004 and 2024. Searches were undertaken across four academic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, ABI/INFORM, and Business Source Complete) and Google Scholar. Data were extracted and analysed, guided by a previously published typology of commercial practices: financial, political, scientific, marketing, supply chain and waste, labour and employment, and reputational management practices.
RESULTS:
Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Marketing, political, and supply chain and waste practices were the most frequently reported, while financial, labour and employment, reputational management, and scientific practices were less common. Our review found that the arms industry not only engages in commercial practices identified within established commercial determinants of health frameworks but also employs additional strategies, such as bribery and corruption, worker surveillance, contesting worker illness claims, and a number of supply chain practices that extend beyond existing typologies. Most studies focused on firearms in the context of the USA, with limited evidence on the practices of other arms industry sub-sectors such as major conventional weapons and nuclear weapons, and little attention to low- and middle-income country contexts.
CONCLUSIONS:
Despite the scale and influence of the arms industry, its commercial sector practices remain largely overlooked in public health research. Greater scrutiny and recognition of the arms industry as a commercial determinant of health is essential to mitigate the health harms and inequities associated with the global production, proliferation, and use of weapons.
| eISSN: | 2654-1459 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
