Exploring awareness of implicit bias within new zealand’s chronic pain management healthcare workforce: is current regulation serving them best?
1
Indiana University, Indiana, United States
Popul. Med. 2026;8(Supplement Supplement 1):A3545
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT:
This study aimed to explore the knowledge and beliefs about implicit bias in chronic pain management healthcare practitioners in New Zealand and analyse the current Regulatory Authority competence documents. Additionally, provide recommendations for Regulatory Authorities regarding messaging, training and competence framework implementation.
METHODS:
The research study was an exploratory mixed-methods approach. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with members of both public and private Chronic Pain Management Services across New Zealand from February 2025 to May 2025. Microsoft teams was used to audio record and transcribe interviews with 15 healthcare practitioners. Interviews were coded using NVivo to identify themes. Regulatory Authority documents were accessed online and explored manually as well as word searched electronically between February 2025 to March 2025. Data was then combined and analysed.
RESULTS:
Several themes emerged from participant interviews regarding sources of perceived knowledge, associated emotions and actions and the perceived effects of implicit bias. A varied understanding of the concept exists within the cohort. An impression of lack of agency regarding change was observed in all interviews. Even though Regulatory Authority competence and code of ethics documents are extensive, they lack definition, measurement or suggested training options for their members regarding implicit bias.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study is the first in New Zealand to qualitatively explore the beliefs and knowledge of any healthcare workforce cohort about implicit bias. Current levels of knowledge are being impacted by a lack of guidance and definition from Regulatory Authorities as well as overall support and access to relevant evidence-based training options. Simple changes within Regulatory Authority documentation, as well as cross-authority collaboration, could positively impact levels of implicit bias knowledge alongside training uptake. These easily implemented changes are needed to promote movement towards the healthcare service goal of patient-centred care.
This study aimed to explore the knowledge and beliefs about implicit bias in chronic pain management healthcare practitioners in New Zealand and analyse the current Regulatory Authority competence documents. Additionally, provide recommendations for Regulatory Authorities regarding messaging, training and competence framework implementation.
METHODS:
The research study was an exploratory mixed-methods approach. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with members of both public and private Chronic Pain Management Services across New Zealand from February 2025 to May 2025. Microsoft teams was used to audio record and transcribe interviews with 15 healthcare practitioners. Interviews were coded using NVivo to identify themes. Regulatory Authority documents were accessed online and explored manually as well as word searched electronically between February 2025 to March 2025. Data was then combined and analysed.
RESULTS:
Several themes emerged from participant interviews regarding sources of perceived knowledge, associated emotions and actions and the perceived effects of implicit bias. A varied understanding of the concept exists within the cohort. An impression of lack of agency regarding change was observed in all interviews. Even though Regulatory Authority competence and code of ethics documents are extensive, they lack definition, measurement or suggested training options for their members regarding implicit bias.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study is the first in New Zealand to qualitatively explore the beliefs and knowledge of any healthcare workforce cohort about implicit bias. Current levels of knowledge are being impacted by a lack of guidance and definition from Regulatory Authorities as well as overall support and access to relevant evidence-based training options. Simple changes within Regulatory Authority documentation, as well as cross-authority collaboration, could positively impact levels of implicit bias knowledge alongside training uptake. These easily implemented changes are needed to promote movement towards the healthcare service goal of patient-centred care.
| eISSN: | 2654-1459 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
