Occupational Distress and Stress Biomarkers Among Public Health Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic
More details
Hide details
1
School of Medicine University of Split, Split, Croatia
2
Faculty of Health Sciences University of Split, Split, Croatia
3
Teaching Public Health Institute of Split-Dalmatia County, Split, Croatia
4
University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
5
Instituto Tecnologico de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
6
University Autonoma de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
Popul. Med. 2026;8(Supplement Supplement 1):A3405
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT:
Background/
OBJECTIVES:
Public healthcare workers face significant occupational stress during crisis situations, yet research on this particular population remains limited com-pared to other healthcare workers. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on distress levels and the sense of coherence among public health workers by integrating psychological assessments with physiological markers of stress to identify protective factors against pandemic-related occupational stress.
METHODS:
This longitudinal study was conducted at the Teaching Public Health Institute of Split and Dalmatia County from July 2021 to February 2022 at two time points: the latency phase (between COVID-19 waves) and hyperarousal phase (during an active wave). Fif-ty-four public health workers participated in the study. There were three questionnaires assessing psychological distress: Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Impact of Events Scale—Revised and Sense of Coherence Scale-29. Salivary and blood samples were col-lected at both time points to measure cortisol levels, cortisol awakening response, and in-terleukin-6 concentrations.
RESULTS:
The cortisol area under the curve with respect to ground (AUCg) was significantly elevated during the stress phase compared to the latency phase (234.8 vs. 201.8; p = 0.023), indicating heightened physiological stress responses. Epidemiologists demonstrated significantly lower sense of coherence scores compared to non-epidemiologists (117.9 ± 9.1 vs. 125.6 ± 10.5; p = 0.029). A lower sense of coherence was significantly associated with higher psychological distress and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that sense of coherence and inter-leukin-6 levels were significant independent predictors of cortisol changes.
CONCLUSIONS:
The findings demonstrate that public health workers experience measurable physiological stress responses during pandemic peaks, with sense of coherence emerging as a protective psychological factor. Interventions targeting sense of coherence and organizational sup-port may possibly enhance resilience and reduce mental health morbidity in this vulnerable workforce during crisis situations.