Using Group Model Building to Identify the Drivers and Levers of the Double Burden of Malnutrition in Cape Town, South Africa
More details
Hide details
1
Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology; Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research; Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
2
Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
3
School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
4
Non-Communicable Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Belville, South Africa
5
Chair of Public Health Nutrition, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
6
Chronic Diseases Initiative for Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
7
Department of Public Health, Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Popul. Med. 2026;8(Supplement Supplement 1):A2936
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The double burden of malnutrition (DBM), consisting of under- and overnutrition, is a substantial health problem in South Africa. Addressing the DBM requires understanding the common drivers and interactions of undernutrition and overweight which is suited to a complex systems approach. This study applied participatory group model building with multisectoral stakeholders in Cape Town to develop a causal loop diagram (CLD) of the drivers and levers of the DBM across the micro- (individual, household) and meso- (community, local policy) level.
METHODS:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 stakeholders at micro-level (community health workers and coordinators) and meso-level (civil society representatives, researchers, and city and provincial government employees). Analysis was conducted using grounded theory and a complex systems approach to assemble preliminary variables on the drivers of the DBM for group model building. One workshop was conducted for each level to develop a CLD depicting drivers of the DBM and identify leverage points for action.
RESULTS:
The CLD illustrates 63 variables within eight themes: food environment domains, social vulnerability and equity awareness, access to resources, governance principles, relationships, barriers to food security, commercial determinants of health, and policy development. At micro-level, stakeholders proposed levers of greater nutrition literacy training for community health workers, support for food gardens, and advocacy on food safety at informal shops and alcohol policy. At meso-level, recommended leverage points included mobilizing civil society, supporting evidence uptake in agenda setting, increasing transparency of the corporate sector, developing structures to enable a healthier food environment, and regulating food marketing.
CONCLUSIONS:
Group model building helped stakeholders develop a shared understanding of the drivers of the DBM as a complex system. The findings of the CLD emphasize that double-duty actions are needed across levels, including strengthening food security within communities and bolstering supportive governance structures to improve healthy food consumption.