Where Enforcement Falls Short: Outdoor Fireworks Risks, Data Gaps, and Multi-Sectoral Strategies for Safer Celebrations in Europe
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Social Work, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, Greece
2
Section Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, European Public Health Association (EUPHA), Utrecht, Netherlands
3
European Association for Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion (EuroSafe), Amsterdam, Netherlands
4
VeiligheidNL, Amsterdam, Netherlands
5
Norwegian Safety Forum, Oslo, Norway
6
Prevention Committee, European Burns Association (EBA), Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
7
Oscare, Organisation for burns, scar aftercare & research, Antwerp, Belgium
8
Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
9
Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
10
University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
11
Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
12
Epidemiology Department, National Institute of Health, Lisbon, Portugal
Popul. Med. 2026;8(Supplement Supplement 1):A3779
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
While directives like EU 2013/29/EU provide harmonized safety standards for market placement (e.g., CE marking, categories F1–F4), and some member states (e.g., Netherlands, Ireland, etc) have moved toward stricter controls, enforcement gaps allow persistent high-risk behaviors, illegal imports, and misuse, especially among youth.
OBJECTIVES:
Review latest epidemiological data on outdoor firework injuries, examine outdoor pyrotechnic safety, surveillance gaps and enforcement limitations.
METHODS:
The presentation will review of EU Directive 2013/29/EU, national enforcement strategies and emerging alternatives(drone/laser shows). It will employ insights from national burns registries (Netherlands, Denmark, Portugal), and injury prevention networks like EU-IDB and EuroSafe to promote harmonized data collection for better tracking of burn severity, long-term outcomes, and prevention efficacy.
RESULTS:
New Year's 2026 incidents in the Netherlands (despite impending ban) saw 1,239 injuries(7% rise from prior year, 29% more ED visits), with 41% involving legal fireworks and over half affecting children/youth(teenagers 44%). In Denmark the prevalence remains unchanged over the last 20 years. Portugal recorded only three firework accidents among 190,000+ injuries(2024). Over-reliance on bans without complementary measures may reduce incidents (e.g., pandemic sales halts cut ~85%), but cultural resistance, black markets, and enforcement shortfalls sustain risks. The ongoing diversion via online/mail-order sales, shows that the Directive fails to fully curb. EU evaluations (2025) identify safety, environmental, and criminal misuse shortcomings in the Directive, prompting consideration of revisions or new instruments. Municipal/local enforcement is also insufficient due to capacity limits, leading to low compliance.
CONCLUSIONS:
It is necessary to shift from purely restrictive approaches to robust, multi-layered enforcement. Strengthening harmonization and multi-authority collaboration (police, schools, local governments, customs) is crucial. Illegal imports and online sales need to be targeted and monitoring to be improved with age checks, and rapid response on celebration nights. School-based programs targeting youth and positive incentives (e.g., public displays) to build buy-in rather than just penalties.